A two-week diagnostic that finds the rules costing you the most decision speed - and the three changes that buy it back. Fixed scope, fixed price, and you see the sample report before you pay anything.
Book the Free Call See the Sample ReportWhy this happens: rules only accumulate. The US Code of Federal Regulations grew from 19,335 pages to 134,261 in 56 years - about 3.5% compound, every single year (Dawson and Seater's count). Companies behave the same way: every incident adds a rule, and no rule ever has to earn its keep again.
We ran a controlled experiment: seventy runs of an AI agent under growing rule sets. An AI agent is not a company - it is the cleanest system in which this arithmetic shows itself. Whether the same collapse is building inside your organization is exactly what this audit measures. On your data, not ours.
Two weeks, fixed scope. Your side of the cost, itemized: three file exports, five 45-minute interviews, one 90-minute readout. No system access. NDA first; exports can be pseudonymized before they leave your building, and everything is deleted after the engagement. Where each number comes from: the Rule Load Index, Coupling Map and speedometer fall out of your exports; the paper-vs-practice gap comes from the interviews cross-checked against the tickets; the three changes are our judgment - ranked, so you can overrule it. And if your ticket history turns out too thin to carry the analysis, we tell you on the free call, before you pay anything.
Week 1 - measure. You send three exports: your ticket system (Jira or whatever you run), your process docs wherever they actually live - Confluence graveyard, ISO folder, workflow configs - and the org chart. Then five interviews, chosen together at kickoff: the people who make the decisions and the people who wait for them.
Rule Load Index - how many binding rules the average decision must clear before it is allowed to happen. A decision is anything that waits for a yes: a release, a hire, a price change, a customer exception. Your baseline.
Coupling Map - the ten rules that touch the most teams, systems, and other rules. These - not your newest policies - are where speed goes to die.
Paper-vs-practice gap - the rules your organization already ignores in practice. Every quiet workaround is a warning light.
Decision speedometer - how long decisions actually take: the median and the spread. Not your dev cycle-time dashboard - decision latency: approvals, exceptions, hires, releases. The spread usually starts climbing before the average does; that is the earliest warning you will get.
Three changes - three specific rules to delete, split, or narrow. For each: why this one, what should get faster, the risk, and how you will see the effect in your own numbers within 60 days. Ranked. Your call which to act on.
The readout - 90 minutes with your leadership team, not a presentation. Minutes 0-30: your five numbers, and how close they say you are to jamming. Minutes 30-70: the Coupling Map, rule by rule - we argue about the three changes until your team owns them, or replaces them with better ones. Minutes 70-90: the tracking metric, so in 60 days you see in your own data whether decision time recovered. You leave with a decision made, not a deck to file.
You do not have to trust us. Before the call you get the sample report: this exact method run on 12 EU digital acts, half a million words of law, every number computed from the official texts on EUR-Lex. You can verify every figure yourself.
No day rate, no extensions, no phase two hiding behind phase one. A full operating-model review from a big firm costs many times this and takes a quarter; this is the surgical version.
About 19,000 PLN. Half on start, half after the readout. One question - which rules cost you the most speed - answered in two weeks: five numbers, three moves.
If the readout does not produce at least three changes your own team agrees are worth making, the second half of the fee is waived.
Bring one recent decision that took too long. We tell you which rules we would look at first and what we would measure - whether or not you hire us. The sample report lands in your inbox before the call. If it is not a fit, you will know inside 30 minutes.
What this is not: a reorg, a transformation program, or a headcount exercise. Nobody gets blamed - every rule in your company was rational the day it was written. We audit the compound effect, not the authors. Legal and compliance keep their veto: we rank, you decide.
More than fifteen years in software: CRM systems consultant, then full-stack engineer, most recently AI transformation projects at Future Processing. Along the way I co-founded a startup and personally pitched the round that raised 3 million PLN. This audit is new: you would be among its first three clients, and the price reflects that. The experiment behind it is real and reproducible; whether it holds at your scale is what the audit tests, on your numbers. I would rather be checkable than believed.
A free 30-minute call. We tell you which rules we would look at first and what we would measure - whether or not you hire us. You get the sample report before the call, so you know exactly what you are buying and can check every figure. Prefer email? maciejxjankowski@proton.me - or find me at linkedin.com/in/maciej.
Book the Free 30-Minute Call