Your AI sounds confident. Should you believe it?

When you ask your AI agent “why did you make that decision?”, it always has an answer. That answer sounds reasonable. Sometimes insightful.

But how much of it is real?

We built a formal framework to measure it. The finding: AI can produce self-explanations 10 layers deep. Only 2.5 are externally verifiable. The other 7.5 levels are a confabulation zone - structurally indistinguishable from genuine reasoning.

This 90-minute workshop gives your team the tools to know where to trust AI and where to verify.

What Your Team Gets

Live Demo

Two AI instances, same model, different contexts. Your team designs the prompts. Watch in real-time as self-referential depth degrades - and learn to spot exactly where.

The Three Numbers

Every AI deployment needs these:

Practical Guidelines

Five rules your team applies Monday morning:

  1. Depth-aware prompting (ask for reasoning at depth 1-2 only)
  2. External verification architecture for anything deeper
  3. Confabulation zone alerts in your AI pipelines
  4. The vacuous embedding detector (spot fake reasoning depth)
  5. Specificity as quality signal

Deliverables

Who This Is For

Teams deploying AI agents for:

The Research Behind It

Based on original research on in-context particularization - a formal framework for measuring self-referential depth in language models. Validated with Prolog formal reasoning, cross-tested across multiple AI instances, and stress-tested with adversarial analysis.

Pricing

Format Price Includes
Standard €2,500 90-min workshop + materials + 1hr follow-up call
Extended €5,000 Half-day with hands-on audit of your AI systems

Bundle with AI Readiness Assessment for 15% off.

Book

Contact Maciej or schedule a call.