When you ask your AI agent “why did you make that decision?”, it always has an answer. That answer sounds reasonable. Sometimes insightful.
But how much of it is real?
We built a formal framework to measure it. The finding: AI can produce self-explanations 10 layers deep. Only 2.5 are externally verifiable. The other 7.5 levels are a confabulation zone - structurally indistinguishable from genuine reasoning.
This 90-minute workshop gives your team the tools to know where to trust AI and where to verify.
Two AI instances, same model, different contexts. Your team designs the prompts. Watch in real-time as self-referential depth degrades - and learn to spot exactly where.
Every AI deployment needs these:
Five rules your team applies Monday morning:
Teams deploying AI agents for:
Based on original research on in-context particularization - a formal framework for measuring self-referential depth in language models. Validated with Prolog formal reasoning, cross-tested across multiple AI instances, and stress-tested with adversarial analysis.
| Format | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | €2,500 | 90-min workshop + materials + 1hr follow-up call |
| Extended | €5,000 | Half-day with hands-on audit of your AI systems |
Bundle with AI Readiness Assessment for 15% off.