Article 4 has applied since 2 February 2025, and national supervision started on 2 August 2026. Most organizations using AI have never mapped who uses what, on which accounts, and what Article 4 asks of them. This 2-hour facilitated assessment maps your AI usage, classifies every system by risk, and delivers a written report with a priority action plan within 48 hours.
Book a Discovery Call See What You GetThe EU AI Act classifies AI systems into four risk tiers. The rules are already in force. Most compliance teams have never done a formal inventory.
Five concrete outputs from a single 2-hour session. Facilitated on-site or remote.
AI Usage Map - A complete inventory of AI tools, systems, and use cases across your organization. Built live during the session, verified by participants from all relevant departments.
Risk Classification - Every identified AI system classified against the AI Act's four-tier framework: prohibited, high-risk, limited risk, minimal risk. No guessing - structured methodology.
Article 4 Compliance Gap Analysis - A clear gap map between your current state and what Article 4 requires. Written evidence of where you're exposed and where you're already covered.
Written Assessment Report - A professional, board-ready document delivered within 48 hours. Suitable for audit preparation, board reporting, or as the foundation for a full compliance program.
Priority Action Roadmap - Numbered actions ranked by impact and effort, with ownership suggestions and timelines.
The obligation is in force and supervision has started.
The AI literacy requirement has applied since 2 February 2025. If your staff use AI at work, even ChatGPT for drafting or translation, you are a deployer under Article 4 (European Commission Q&A on AI literacy, updated July 2026). No specific format, number of hours or certificate is prescribed. What counts is measures fitted to your staff and context, and a record that they happened.
Since 2 August 2026, national market surveillance authorities supervise Article 4 and may impose penalties under national law, proportionate to the infringement. In Poland that body is KRiBSI, established by the Act on AI Systems signed in July 2026. A written assessment on file is the minimum defensible position.
Financial sector supervisors and enterprise procurement teams are adding AI governance questions to their due diligence process. Having a written assessment on file is the minimum defensible position.
One session. A clear picture of your exposure. A document you can act on.
Visual Element
EU AI Act compliance is a legal question with a technical answer. Getting the risk classification right requires both.
20+ years in software engineering and architecture. Built and led AI consulting practice. Created nSENS - a 34-persona adversarial validation framework used to stress-test business and technology decisions. Ran a hands-on workshop for a bank's directors in which they learned to specify work precisely, the same discipline that working with AI demands. Speaks both the technical language of AI systems and the governance language boards and audit committees need.
Book a free 15-minute call to confirm the format fits your situation. We'll tell you honestly if you need something smaller - or if your exposure is larger than a 2-hour session covers.
Book a 15-Minute Discovery Call