Zbigniew Protocol

Stress-Test Your Methodology Before Someone Else Does

You've built a framework. You've made claims. You've cited research. But have you actually verified it — or just convinced yourself? The Zbigniew Protocol turns AI against your own IP: fact-checking citations, detecting cognitive biases, mapping competitors, and finding the gaps before your clients or investors do.

Book Assessment Call See What We Check

Every Methodology Has Blind Spots

The more you invest in building a framework, the harder it becomes to see its flaws. This is the IKEA Effect — and it's the #1 risk for any organization selling intellectual property.

  • Citations drift — you cited a study 18 months ago. The field has moved. Are your numbers still right?
  • Confirmation bias — you found research that supports your framework. Did you look for research that contradicts it?
  • Competitor blind spots — your 'unique methodology' may have 5 competitors you haven't heard of
  • Unverified projections — your '85% success rate' started as a design target and became a marketing claim
  • Credential gaps — you're selling expertise you haven't formally validated yet
Every Methodology Has Blind Spots

The Zbigniew Protocol: 5-Gate Verification

Named after Zbigniew Herbert — the poet who demanded truth without decoration. We deploy parallel AI agents with adversarial mandates against your methodology, then synthesize findings into actionable intelligence.

1

Fact-Check Gate — Every citation verified against primary sources. Every number checked. Every attribution confirmed. We found 5 critical errors in 17 claims when we ran this on our own frameworks.

2

Bias Detection Gate — 47 cognitive biases screened systematically. Not a checklist exercise — each bias assessed with specific evidence from your materials. IKEA Effect, Confirmation Bias, Dunning-Kruger, Narrative Fallacy, and 43 more.

3

Competitive Landscape Gate — Parallel research agents map every existing tool, framework, and methodology that overlaps with your claims. You'll know exactly where you're unique and where you're reinventing the wheel.

4

Red Team Gate — Adversarial personas argue against your methodology. Strongest counterarguments. Alternative explanations. What makes this look foolish in 2 years. Cui bono analysis.

5

Monetization Scoring Gate — Weighted assessment across 6 criteria: market demand, time to revenue, credibility to deliver, defensibility, scalability, and risk. Kill/keep/pivot recommendation for each component.

Case Study: 5 Frameworks Audited in One Afternoon

We ran the Zbigniew Protocol on our own intellectual property — 5 original methodologies spanning AI partnership, executive coaching, and mental health. The results were uncomfortable and invaluable.

  • 17 claims fact-checked against primary publications — 5 critical errors found
  • 7 cognitive biases flagged — 3 rated HIGH (IKEA Effect, Narrative Fallacy, Dunning-Kruger)
  • Competitive landscape mapped across 3 domains — 15+ competitors identified
  • 2 methodologies rated 'sell now,' 1 'pilot,' 1 'park,' 1 'keep as content'
  • All public pages updated with honest status disclaimers and falsifiable predictions
  • Full audit report, corrected citations, and monetization roadmap delivered same day
Case Study: 5 Frameworks Audited in One Afternoon

What You Get

Every audit produces a comprehensive report designed for decision-makers — not a vague 'areas for improvement' document.

Citation Verification Report

Every claim in your methodology checked against primary sources. Verdicts: Verified, Partially Verified, Wrong, Unverified. Specific corrections provided.

Cognitive Bias Audit

47 biases screened with evidence-based ratings (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW). The biases that apply to your specific situation, not a generic list.

Competitive Landscape Map

Who else does what you claim to do? Where are the real gaps? Where are you duplicating existing work? Includes competitor strengths, weaknesses, and your positioning opportunities.

Red Team Report

The strongest arguments against your methodology. Counter-evidence. Alternative explanations. What a sophisticated critic would say. Better to hear it from us than from a client.

Monetization Assessment

Weighted scoring across 6 criteria with kill/keep/pivot recommendations. Revenue models, pricing suggestions, and go-to-market sequencing.

Corrected Materials

Updated citations, revised claims, honest status labels. Ready to publish with confidence that every statement can withstand scrutiny.

Investment

Priced by scope of methodology and depth of audit required.

Rapid Audit

Single methodology or pitch deck. Fact-check + bias screen + competitive scan. 1-2 day turnaround. From 5,000 PLN.

Standard Protocol

Full 5-gate Zbigniew Protocol on 1-3 methodologies. Includes red team and monetization scoring. 3-5 day turnaround. From 12,000 PLN.

Full Portfolio Audit

Complete IP portfolio review. All methodologies, frameworks, and public claims. Strategic recommendations and corrected materials. 1-2 week turnaround. From 25,000 PLN.

What Would an Honest Audit Find in Your Methodology?

Book a 15-minute call. Describe your framework. We'll tell you honestly whether the Zbigniew Protocol would find anything — or if your IP is already bulletproof.

Book 15-Minute Call